Message to Web Thingy Developers: I am a lazy bastard

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

This post is dedicated to the hard working developers behind whoisi.com, profilactic.com, FriendFeed.com (to whom I give special thanks for providing distractions for me daily), and all the other social aggregators out there. I do this out of love.

Dave Winer just made a post about whoisi.com, singing its praises and awesomeness.

I checked out the site. Cute, another follow this person aggregator. Searched for my “EricaJoy” (if I learned anything at Google, it is branding) and found nothing. Went through the steps to add myself (for uh testing purposes) by adding the site I own (heh, you’re reading it) and waited for the magic.

Nothing happened.

I clicked the “Add another site button” and waited for more magic.

Still none.

I then screamed at my computer (I do that, don’t you?) and closed the site.

What was the cause of my frustration? The fact that here is Yet Another Social Aggregator that wants me to add info into it instead of being smart and finding my info that I’ve already put on the internet eleventyhundred times.

>>>WEB THINGY DEVELOPERS READ ME<<<*

The Social Graph API is your friend. It is my friend. It is smart, charming, sexy, and the life of any party. Other API’s are jealous of it. Here’s what it does:

With the Social Graph API, developers can now utilize public connections their users have already created in other web services. It makes information about public connections between people easily available and useful.

Oh ho, what was that? Did that little block quote just say it can use the public connections I’ve already created on other sites to help figure out  “who is I” (see what I did there)?

Let’s see what the social graph API knows about me:

I’ll be damned, look at that. Based off one URL, 6 of my other identities have been discovered.

Lets make like some hypothetically very well done site has used this API and presented me with these 6 sites saying something to the effect of “Hey thanks for adding ericabaker.com, these look like they might be you too. Are they?” to which I respond “Why yes they are, thank you for asking,” by clicking on every single one of them to add to the data about me. Now the site knows that These Sites Are EricaJoy’s and can do another API query to find even more sites that belong to me.

 

Oh snap. Look at all my identities out there for some smart web site to associate with me. Where is my Staples easy button when I need to press it?

Executive Summary:

I am lazy. Use the Social Graph API instead of asking me over and over and fricking over again where all my profiles are.

*Sorry, that was obnoxious. But effective, no?

 

Related posts:

  1. Spiffeeds and bad gadget design. For some reason, Blogger lacks the ability to pop in...
  2. Welcome FeedBurner! Official Google Blog: Adding more flareIt’s True-gle! Happy happy happy!Joy...

  • tia
    Hi Erica,

    My name is Tia and I'm an editor at OpposingViews.com, the debate website. Since we both cover technology and Internet issues, I thought I'd drop you a note. I would've e-mailed you but I couldn't find an address.
    See, we're currently having a discussion about whether or not the Internet should be free. You can see it here:
    http://www.opposingviews.com/questions/should-t...
    Although vetted experts are the ones doing the debating, anyone can contribute by choosing a side and posting comments about the experts' arguments.
    Check it out and, if you have the time, let me know what you think at tia@opposingviews.com Thanks!
  • Hanksnan
    Hi - pardon me for reaching out to you this way! I am hoping to ask Google New York to sponsor a workshop I am conducting called "Blogging the World: An Online Stage for Activists (Or Performatory Blogging for Everyone)" at an international conference Performing the World http://www.performingtheworld.org/ that will be taking place in NYC October 2-5.

    The concept is to bring together a number of bloggers and alternative and new media folks to talk about blogging and political activism, and to cover the conference as well by "live-blogging" the sessions. It's a "happening" within the Happening...We have a distinguished panel of bloggers and alternative media journalists and I'd love to be able to hold the workshop at the Google New York office in Chelsea.

    In addition, if you or anyone at Google would be interested in participating on the panel speaking about how technology is democratizing our political culture, I would be interested in pursuing that as well.

    I would appreciate the opportunity to speak to someone at the New York office about this. Thanks for considering. Please feel free to contact me at 646-567-6641.

    Regards
    Nancy

    --

    Nancy Hanks
    The Hankster
    http://grassrootsindependent.blogspot.com/
    646-567-6641
blog comments powered by Disqus